SLIDE-1-TITLE-HERE

Replace these every slider sentences with your featured post descriptions.Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premiumbloggertemplates.com[...]

SLIDE-2-TITLE-HERE

Replace these every slider sentences with your featured post descriptions.Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premiumbloggertemplates.com[...]

SLIDE-3-TITLE-HERE

Replace these every slider sentences with your featured post descriptions.Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premiumbloggertemplates.com[...]

If you are going [...]

SLIDE-4-TITLE-HERE

Replace these every slider sentences with your featured post descriptions.Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premiumbloggertemplates.com[...]

SLIDE-5-TITLE-HERE

Replace these every slider sentences with your featured post descriptions.Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premiumbloggertemplates.com[...]

Sunday 28 February 2010

Independent Films To Blockbuster Films


Most of the films from the last decade that are being regarded as the best have come from independent and foreign cinema as opposed to Hollywood cinema. In the 90s, this wasn't so; Forrest Gump, Schindler's List, Braveheart, Titanic and Gladiator were among the landmark movies of that decade. However, the last ten years have, instead, seen movies like Memento, Pan's Labyrinth, Lost In Translation, Slumdog Millionaire, There Will Be Blood and Juno become some of the films that people will look back on in years to come and call 'the cinema of the noughties'.

It seems that many producers in Hollywood have begun to notice the undeniable quality of independent and foreign cinema in recent years. Especially in contrast to some of their latest blockbuster films. I mean, I'm sure there aren't many film lovers who'd say that Michael Bay's $200 million dollar Transformers franchise is anywhere near as good as the aforementioned Memento or Pan's Labyrinth. Even despite being produced with only a fraction of Bay's budget. Therefore, these Hollywood producers have begun to approach filmmakers in indie and foreign cinema to direct their big budget releases in, apparently, an attempt to make them better.

For example, only last month it was announced that, after having a hit with the quirky indie comedy 500 Days Of Summer, the film's director, Marc Webb, would now be behind the reboot of the Spider Man franchise. Moreover, director of the breathtakingly good German thriller The Lives Of Others, Florian Henckel Von Donnersmarck, was approached last year about making the action film, The 28th Amendment, with Tom Cruise in the lead. Also, let's not forget that Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind's Michel Gondry will be behind the upcoming Green Hornet film.

This seems to show that Hollywood is running low on creativity and is fairly incapable of making a truly amazing movie like the ones listed above anymore. And where Hollywood is falling short, indie and foreign cinema is picking up the slack. The box office and DVD intakes still show that blockbusters are more popular, but they aren't getting the good reviews and the awards recognition that films such as Sideways, City Of God, Capote, Little Miss Sunshine, Good Night And Good Luck and The Diving Bell And The Butterfly are getting. These films are intelligent, creative, powerful, well made and are filled with a heart and soul that doesn't seem to exist in Hollywood any more.

But why does Hollywood suddenly care about hiring indie and foreign filmmakers to back the big budget releases and making good quality film again? After all, Spider Man 3 and Pirates Of The Caribbean 3 both made enough money for any producer to retire on and they weren't good quality. There are 3 words that, in my opinion, answer this question:

The Dark Knight.

The Dark Knight showed Hollywood what can really be achieved if you mix the blockbuster approach to a film with the quality that independent cinema has reached in the last few years: It can make a film become a phenomenon. While there are plenty of people who haven't seen Iron Man or Twilight, there aren't many people who haven't seen The Dark Knight. Why is this? Because not only was it the perfect film to draw a large audience with a romance story, spectacular action scenes and a few moments of laugh out loud humour, it was also an incredible crime drama that takes it's place alongside the very best. Therefore, it was able to sweep the box office, receive good reviews, bag a handful of awards, and most of all, and become one of the biggest selling movies of all time.

Oh, and can you guess who was the man behind it all? Christopher Nolan. The British director of the independent neo-noir Memento.

In summary, it seems apparent to me that Hollywood seeking independent and foreign directors to back the big releases to breathe new life into blockbuster films. Not only because are they are running out of creativity, but also because, in my opinion, every producer in America is aspiring to have a hit on the same level as The Dark Knight.

By Daniel Sarath with No comments

Saturday 27 February 2010

Popularity Vs Quality - Which makes a film worthy of being called Best Picture?


My Dad and I were having a discussion about a comment made on the radio today. The presenter was arguing that Avatar should have won the Best Picture award at the BAFTAs and not The Hurt Locker because, first of all, it is the biggest selling film of all time and, second of all, because such a large number of people have enjoyed it. In other words, he is suggesting that, during awards season, movies should be judged by how much money they make at the box office and by how well-liked these films are by audiences. Not just by the quality of the picture. However, I disagree with these arguments.

Let's look at his first point by using the year 2007, one of the best years of cinema in the last two decades, as an example. It saw the releases of There Will Be Blood, No Country For Old Men, Atonement and, one of my all time favourites, The Assassination Of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford. A large number of critics called them some the best films of the decade, two of them are in IMDB's Top 250 list and they were all voted into the 'Top 100 Films Of All Time' list by Empire readers.

These movies were all nominated for a ton BAFTAs and Atonement ended up taking home the top prize. But neither Atonement or any of the other aforementioned movies were the highest grossing films that year. That was Spider Man 3. The comic book sequel made almost $400,000,000 while the others couldn’t even hit the $100,000,000 mark.

The presenter on the radio, therefore, would argue that Spider Man 3 should have won the BAFTA for Best Picture and not Atonement. Yet, as anyone who saw the film probably knows, it certainly wasn’t worthy of any kind of award. Especially not in contrast to the masterpieces that I listed above. The Times called it "a towering disappointment", The Daily Telegraph called it "a collection of scenes, and occasionally great visuals or gags, strung together by an inadequate plot" and the NYC FIlm Critic called it "a sprawling mess that awkwardly attempts to make room for two additional villains." Not only did critics hate it though. So did the fans. The film is only rated 6.4 on the IMDB, comments on Rotten Tomatoes call it "disappointing" and those aforementioned Empire readers voted it into the 'Bottom 100 Films Of All Time'.

Obviously there is a slight difference here in the fact that Spider Man 3 was received by audiences and critics far less favourably than Avatar. As the presenter's said, Avatar has been enjoyed by such a large number of people as well as being a box office smash. So should it have won the Best Picture award and not The Hurt Locker then? Well, I can see his point here. While The Hurt Locker did blow a lot of viewers away, it’s far from the phenomenon that Avatar is. But I’ll repeat the name of the award: Best Picture. Avatar would certainly have won if it was called ‘Picture Most Loved By Audiences’. But that was not the award. The award was for the best made film of the year. That means it had to be something that was well directed, well acted and well written in addition to being popular. It had to be something that was unique, challenged the medium and pushed cinema to it’s limits. It had to provoke thought and have a relevant and interesting message within it. The Hurt Locker did all these things. Therefore, while it’s not the best film I’ve seen this year, it was certainly a worthy winner. As would have been An Education, Up In The Air or Precious. Avatar, however, would not have been. It does challenge the medium in terms of it’s special effects and it is certainly well directed. But the story is anything but original and the writing is among the worst I’ve seen in a Blockbuster from 2009. This doesn’t necessarily mean it’s wrong to like the film; it’s a film that for all it’s flaws is a thoroughly entertaining popcorn flick. However, the winner of the BAFTA for Best Picture needed to be more than that. After all, cinema isn’t just entertainment. It’s art.

By Daniel Sarath with No comments

Friday 26 February 2010

Could this hurt The Hurt Locker's chances for Oscar glory?

I hope all is well with you. I just wanted to write you and say I hope you liked Hurt Locker and if you did and want us to win, please tell (name deleted) and your friends who vote for the Oscars, tell actors, directors, crew members, art directors, special effects people, if everyone tells one or two of their friends, we will win and not a $500M film, we need independent movies to win like the movies you and I do, so if you believe The Hurt Locker is the best movie of 2010, help us!

I'm sure you know plenty of people you've worked with who are academy members whether a publicist, a writer, a sound engineer, please take 5 minutes and contact them. Please call one or two persons, everything will help!

best regards,

Nicolas
Chartier Voltage Pictures

The Hurt Locker could take home the biggest prize in the film industry in two weeks time: Best Picture at the Academy Awards. Should it win, The Hurt Locker will join the small collection of movies, including the likes of Casablanca, The Godfather and One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest, which have won this prestigious title. The chances of it winning are strong too. It's already swept the Best Picture award at the
BAFTAs, the Satellite awards and Writers Guild Awards along with many others.

However, not only does producer Mr. Chartier attack a fellow nominee in the above letter, he also breaks the Oscar's rules by begging the voters to consider his film when they nominate what they think should be the Best Picture winner of 2009. So will this kill it's chances of walking away with the award? We can debate the answer to that question all night long. The question I want to ask here is this: Should it affect it's chances of winning Best Picture at the Oscar's in two weeks time? Does it really matter what the producer did?

After all, the fact that he has been asking for votes, no matter how wrong it may be, doesn't make the film any less great. And isn't that what they are supposed to judge by at the end of the day? By how great a film is? The wrong-doings of a single man don't detract for Katherine Bigalow's direction, the unconventionally brilliant structure of the film or especially the stunning investigation into soldiers' psyches by it's writer Mark Boal.

No matter how meaningless the letter is to the enjoyment of The Hurt Locker, it wouldn't be the first time the Oscars have made a decision based on a movie's bad press. Martin Scorcese's classic sports drama Raging Bull, which was the most likely to win the Best Picture award in 1980, lost to Ordinary People after a man claimed the director's earlier film, Taxi Driver, influenced his decision to attempt to assassinate a politician.

If this letter does affect the chances of The Hurt Locker winning the award, what will be 2010's Ordinary People? Could it be Avatar? It is the biggest selling film of all time and has won over audiences around the globe. Could it be Precious? It's certainly got the independent cinema lovers behind it having won at Sundance in January and at Toronto this fall. Or could it even be Up In The Air seeing as it took home a number of critics awards this year?

By Daniel Sarath with No comments