Saturday, 13 November 2010
FILM CHALLENGE: 180) There Will Be Blood
Added Jan 6, 2010,
180) There Will Be Blood
Director: Paul Thomas Anderson
Year: 2007
Plot Summary: The film follows the rise to power of Daniel Plainview, a charismatic and ruthless oil prospector who learns of oil-rich land in California that can be bought cheaply. He moves his operation there and begins manipulating and exploiting the local landowners into selling him their property.
There Will Be Blood could possibly be greatest film of the last ten years, a two and a half hour epic that, despite being set during the turn of the 20th century, says more about the 21st century than any other movie has done thus far. Though it's a simple story of rivalry, Paul Thomas Anderson's film becomes a masterpiece in the way that it uses this narrative to subtly speak about capitalism, the war in Iraq, the greed for oil and bring to light many of the political, sociological and cultural aspects that have come to define the decade.
In one of cinema's greatest screen performances, Daniel Day Lewis shines as the greed-hungry Daniel Plainview who comes to Little Boston in search for oil only to find himself locked in a head-to-head battle for power with the local evangelical priest Eli Sunday. In many ways, Plainview's story draws parallels with the aforementioned war in Iraq. Just like how American soldiers where sent to install confidence and hope in the Iraqi citizens, despite the ulterior motives of finding oil, Daniel has to win the trust of the religious town before he can achieve what he wants.
Plainview is not just simply greedy or consumed by the Capitalist desire to have everything though, he also fancies himself a god. The name in Hebrew translates to Judgment of God and he does, indeed, fancy himself smarter than most people as one of the sources of his superiority. In the final scene, in fact, he screams at Eli “I am the third revelation! Because I’m smarter than you!”
In this respect, it's interesting to note that there is no dialogue for about 20 minutes at the beginning of the movie. In these scenes, after all, he is simply just a hard-working silver miner and is totally insignificant. It's only when he strikes gold and starts his own drilling company that he speaks. Paul Thomas Anderson provokes much thought on the class system made by Capitalist society through this artistic choice.
The metaphor of the voice as 'power' might also help to put emphasis on why Plainview sends home him son when his hearing is impaired by an accident on the derrick. He no longer serves any purpose as he doesn't further his image and, therefore, his power and so he has no use for him any more.
Another interesting theme that There Will Be Blood raises is about the "American Dream". As Chuck Palahniuk states in his book Stranger Than Fiction, the American Dream is "to get so rich you can rise above the rabble, all those people on the freeway or, worse, the bus." Similarly, Daniel Plainview longs to be away from all the people in the barren wasteland of Little Boston and all the lower forms of life who work for him in There Will Be Blood. This is symbolised by the house he describes to his brother Henry and where he eventually ends up in the movie's finale. However, as with the nature of capitalism and greed, it becomes obvious that he still wants more and more even he reaches this goal. There's no stopping him. And this can be a powerful and evil force as we witness in the already infamous and bravura closing minutes.
The cinematography and music help to make emphasis on these aforementioned themes of the corrupting nature of capitalism and the American Dream. The former frames the derrick at the heart of Little Boston like a foreboding cloud constantly hanging over the little town, giving it the potential to cause great destruction and despair though obviously inanimate. The latter, composed the Jonny Greenwood of Radiohead, creates a constant sense of dread and disquiet even in the most ordinary of moments.
As engrossing a story as you will ever find, There Will Be Blood provokes much debate and discussion through its many layers of meaning and subtext that it encourages the audience to piece together without ever losing its entertainment. And if that isn't enough, it also features a screen performance by Day Lewis that rivals De Niro in Taxi Driver or Brando in On The Waterfront. A landmark in modern cinema that future film-makers will surely aspire to match, though it would take something incredible to top this.
5/5
1 comments:
Did I already post my little review?
I'll go again anyway, from my last rewatch like 2 years and a half ago (which acknowledges that it's a rewatch):
My opinion of the film has remained consistent since I saw it in the cinema back in February. Despite the somewhat ridiculous context that does put me off often when I think of it, the commanding imagery is so engaging and inspiring that I love it. Even as a big fan of Jesse James I do think it deserved its cinematography win; not above Jesse James but still. I definitely nod Paul Thomas Anderson for his vision. Daniel Day-Lewis gives an incredibly strong but one note performance of a character, most effectively described as "angry". It's an extremely commanding performance, from his hateful rants, his glorified speeches and his painful confessions. The direction does hold on to a lot of moments with Day-Lewis and it's extremely effective, even if it does make the film stretch on with its pacing. Paul Dano gives an underrated performance, yet he completely embodies the role and almost manages to steal the show from Day-Lewis. The end wouldn't have worked as well without him. Thankfully, the screenplay adds comforting black comedy elements when it gets too contrived, almost making a joke of itself and redeeming that flaw just making me feel more engrossed. However, it is a film I struggle to truly feel involved and attached to, mostly because the characters are quite dislikeable. The score is wonderfully entwined with the images with the classical edge making it quite elaborate and almost disturbing of its intentions; however, it's almost unlistenable as a stand alone piece. My personal favourite of the 2007 Best Picture nominees. The film is my third favourite Paul Thomas Anderson film, a director I favour a lot and earns its spot on my top 100. Bravo.
Now I'm in the mood to rewatch it.
Post a Comment